Bioterrorism Frequently Asked Questions
1. How do I identify an agent of biological warfare in my patients?
2. What are the most likely agents that will be used in a biological attack?
3. What is the possibility of a bioterrorist attack?
4. When is it acceptable to announce the possibility of a bioterrorist attack to the authorities?
5. Who will respond to a bioterrorist attack?
6. What do we tell the lab if we suspect a bioterrorism agent?
7. What are some important steps that a hospital can take in order to be better prepared for a bioterrorist attack?
8. What decontamination steps should be taken for possible Anthrax exposure from a letter?
9. What agents can be tested for at the state level, for example in California?
10. Are vaccines available for Bioterrorism agents? How efficacious are they?
11. Where can I find more information on bioterrorism?
Because early symptoms of most biological agent illnesses are nonspecific, the first clue might be that there is a similar case from the same building, event, neighborhood, etc. This is a signal to call infection control and the local public health department immediately. You should contact the local health department any time there is an unusual or suspicious illness, particularly if there is a cluster of patients presenting with the same symptoms. Vigilant surveillance is the key to detecting outbreaks early.
There are several epidemiological clues to a bioterrorist attack. They include: geographical pattern, sudden cluster of illness, occurrence outside of endemic area, and/or sick or dead animals.
If a patient reports a suspected exposure to a biological agent, then law enforcement should be contacted to evaluate the credibility of the threat. Although patients may request nasal swabs or other tests for anthrax, it is important to understand that the reliability of this test is very limited. Nasal swab for anthrax cannot be used to rule out exposure for a particular individual. It is used as an epidemiologic tool to determine if people may have been exposed in an area in which anthrax spores are found. Nasal swab testing should only be done if recommended by public health officials as part of an epidemiologic investigation.
If patients present with illness that may be due to a biological agent, then testing for these agents may be indicated. Anthrax can be identified on blood culture or culture of skin lesions. Special testing may be required to identify anthrax or other agents. The lab should be notified if a biological terrorism agent is suspected.
While no one knows for sure exactly what agents a terrorist will use, several agents have been identified as having the greatest potential for use as a biological weapon. These agents are classified as Category A agents and include Anthrax, Smallpox, Plague, Botulism, Tularemia, and Viral Hemorrhagic Fever. Category A agents are relatively easily disseminated or transmitted and can cause high mortality and social disruption. Special preparation by the health care community is required to prepare for a bioterrorist attack at this level. Although virtually any micro-organism has the potential to be used as a biological weapon, most would be difficult to weaponize and disseminate effectively. (Lillibridge SR, Bell AJ, and Roman RS. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:463-4.)
We have already seen that small-scale biological attacks can occur. Many people are afraid to think about a large-scale bioterrorism event. They think it is too terrible to happen. However, most experts agree that it is a possibility for which we should be prepared. Even though a major attack could be devastating, advanced preparations could minimize the consequences.
Immediately. If you suspect that a patient may have an illness related to a bioterrorist event, you should notify your local public health department without delay. In addition, you should notify the hospital infection control team, the hospital lab, hospital administrators, and other necessary personnel as mandated by your institution's disaster plan. If a patient reports a possible exposure to a biological agent, then law enforcement should be notified to evaluate the credibility of the threat.
The initial response to a bioterrorist incident will be through local public health investigation and laboratory testing and will involve public health, police, fire, and EMS. The first 24-48 hours of the response time will be primarily confined to state and local responders. This is why it is so important for your institution to have an established working relationship with the local public health officials. Prompt communication will allow these officials to activate state authorities including state public health, disaster management, and the National Guard. The federal agencies that will respond to a bioterrorist event include the CDC, FEMA, FBI, and the Department of Defense. (Guidotti TL. Bioterrorism and the Public Health Response. Am J Prev Med 2000;18:178-180.)
Notify the lab as soon as a bioterrorist agent is suspected, as some labs require special processing to improve yield. Notification is also important to ensure the safety of lab workers, because some agents pose potential risks to them. Some biological agents require a high BSL (BioSafety Level). The BSL capabilities of labs vary, so it is important to know the capabilities of your local lab before sending them a suspected bioterrorist agent. This is also important because labs also range in their ability to test for various agents, from A (clinical labs) to D (CDC).
Some important steps to take include:
(Atlas R. The Medical Threat for Biological Weapons. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 1998; 24(3):157-68.)
We also suggest that you develop and maintain accurate contact information and a good working relationship with your local health department.
Appropriate response to possible anthrax exposure in a letter is to call 911, place the envelope in a plastic bag or just set it down and cover it with something. Wash hands and other exposed areas of the body with soap and water. People should be removed from the immediate proximity of the letter, and the names of those who were in the immediate area should be noted. Although in most cases it is difficult for anthrax spores in a letter to become airborne, spores that are specially prepared may pose a threat of inhalation anthrax to those in the immediate area.
The state of California Public Health Lab is capable of testing for category A agents including anthrax, plague, tularemia, brucellosis, and botulism. The remaining category A agents must be sent to the CDC for testing and confirmation. The capability of local health departments to test biological agents varies by county. These differences represent little variation in the time necessary to identify a biological agent if public health response is activated early.
The anthrax vaccine was developed in the 1950s and is a strain producing a protective antibody response in 7 days. Doses are required at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 18 months with annual boosters. The United States military first started mass vaccinating troops for the Gulf war in 1991. The anthrax vaccine is only recommended for people between 18 and 65.
There is a great deal of debate about the safety and efficacy of the anthrax vaccine in the setting of intentional aerosol exposure. There is no solid data on anthrax vaccine safety, especially in large numbers of people, and the incidence of systemic adverse reactions appears to be about 0.006-.5%. There have been no randomized trials done in humans for intentional exposure.
Although minor local reactions are common (about 30%), the best data suggest that systemic reactions are rare (0.06 - 0.5%). Unfortunately, the data from recent military vaccination programs has been incomplete. It's always possible that more adverse reactions will come to light when a vaccine like this is given to large numbers of people, but based on the existing data, it appears to be pretty safe. (Moran GJ. Biological Terrorism Parts I and II. Emergency Medicine 2000.)
Although no gold-standard double-blind, placebo controlled human efficacy trials have been conducted, a single-blind, placebo controlled trial using the less potent form of the vaccine was conducted in goat hair mill workers in New Hampshire from 1955-59. The vaccine conferred statistically significant reduction in the incidence of anthrax overall (cutaneous plus inhalational) and suggested a reduction in the incidence of inhalational anthrax, but the numbers of cases of inhalational disease were too small to attain statistical significance. In addition, trials on non-human primates and guinea pigs have shown that the vaccine is effective against fatal disease due to infection by the aerosol route. (Friedlander AM, Pittman PR, et al. Anthrax Vaccine: Evidence for Safety and Efficacy Against Inhalational Anthrax. JAMA. 1999;282:2104-6.)
In the setting of a known or strongly suspected anthrax exposure, the potential benefit of the vaccine would likely exceed the risk. The risk/benefit balance for pre-exposure vaccination for large numbers of people is debatable, since the probability of exposure is very low for most. (Moran GJ. Biological Terrorism Part I and II. Emergency Medicine 2000.)
The supply of anthrax vaccine is currently very limited, and it is unlikely that it would be made available to civilian populations. Prevention of anthrax after exposure will more likely rely on giving antibiotics.
SmallpoxThe existing vaccine may prevent or ameliorate illness if given with in 3-4 days of exposure. Passive immunization is capable through vaccinia immune globulin if given within the first 24 hours of exposure. There are approximately 5 to 10 million doses of the small pox vaccine in the United States, however no distribution program currently exists. (Gordon SM. The Threat of Bioterrorism: A Reason to Learn More About Anthrax and Smallpox. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 1999;66(10): 592-600.)
The United States has recently contracted with several companies to develop more vaccines.
Viral Hemorrhagic FeversAn investigational new drug (IND) vaccine is available for Argentine hemorrhagic fever (AHF) that may also protect for Bolivian hemorrhagic fever (BHF). There are also two vaccines for Rift Valley fever (RVF) designed by the military. The first vaccine requires 3 boosters and then is effective for 20 years. The second is a live attenuated strain that is still being tested. (Franz DR, et al. Clinical Recognition and Management of Patients Exposed to Biological Warfare Agents. JAMA. 1997;278(5):399-411.) Research is being done to develop vaccines for Ebola and other severe hemorrhagic fevers, but a usable vaccine is probably many years off.
PlagueA USA licensed formaldehyde-killed whole bacilli vaccine was discontinued in 1999 because it was only effective against bubonic plague. Research is currently underway for a vaccine to protect against pneumonic plague. (Inglesby TV, et al. Plague as a Biological Weapon. JAMA. 2000;283(17):228-90.)
TularemiaThere is an attenuated live tularemia vaccine currently available in the United States as an IND. (Franz DR, et al. Clinical Recognition and Management of Patients Exposed to Biological Warfare Agents. JAMA. 1997;278(5):399-411.)
Q fever
There is a Q fever vaccine available in Australia; it is still under investigation in the United States. People who are already immune to Q fever develop severe local reactions. Therefore, it is necessary to test for immunity prior to giving the vaccination. (Franz DR, et al. Clinical Recognition and Management of Patients Exposed to Biological Warfare Agents. JAMA. 1997;278(5):399-411.)
Botulism
There is an IND vaccine for botulism currently available in the United States. (Franz DR, et al. Clinical Recognition and Management of Patients Exposed to Biological Warfare Agents. JAMA. 1997;278(5):399-411.)
Viral Encephalitis
Immunizations are available for Venezuelan equine encephalitis (VEE), western equine encephalitis (WEE), and eastern equine encephalitis (EEE) in the United States but may require multiple injections and are poorly immunogenic. Adequate immunization against encephalitis may require polyvalent vaccines. (Franz DR, et al. Clinical Recognition and Management of Patients Exposed to Biological Warfare Agents. JAMA. 1997;278(5):399-411.)
There are many sites that have reliable information regarding bioterrorism. They include: www.bt.cdc.gov; www.fema.gov; www.nbc-med.org; www.hopkins-biodefense.org; and www.apic.org. The information on these sites ranges from bioterrorism protocol and educational materials to developing a bioterrorism readiness plan and identifying biological agents. You should also review the BT Publications and Links pages on this site as these pages have additional information. Your local and state public health departments will also have information on bioterrorism. They are excellent resources that may be more specifically applicable to your location/setting.